Socratic lens
Test the assumption.
Ask what is being taken for granted, whose evidence matters, what a counterexample would show and who lives with the consequence.
How does hearing this as Sañjaya's report to Dhṛtarāṣṭra, rather than an abstract philosophical treatise, change what Kṛṣṇa's counsel to Arjuna is doing?
When a single Sanskrit compound can be split and glossed in more than one defensible way, what does the chosen word-by-word division make visible, and what does it foreclose?
How can the many centuries of commentary on this text (Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, Madhusūdana, and others) be honoured rather than flattened by one close, literal English rendering?
What does it mean to call this edition complete: is completeness about verse count alone, or also about the layers of reading a single verse can support?